175 Md. App. 153 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gargliano v. State · State v. Suddith · DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins Hospital · Quartertime Video & Vending Corp. v. Hanna · Jackson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Prohibited conduct.—Except as authorized by this subheading, it is unlawful for any person: (1) To ... possess a controlled dangerous substance in sufficient quantity to reasonably indicate under all circumstances an intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled dangerous substance; (b) Penalty.—Any person who violates any of the provisions of subsection (a) of this section with respect to: (1) A substance classified in Schedules I or II which is a narcotic drug is guilty of a felony and is subject to imprisonment for not more than 20 years, 'or a fine of not more than $25,000, or both. (c) Sentencing.—(1) A person who is convicted under subsection (b)(1) ... of this section shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not less than 10 years and subject to a fíne not exceeding $100,000 if the person previously has been convicted: (i) Under subsection (b)(1) ... of this section;.... (2) The prison sentence of a person sentenced under subsection (b)(1) ... of this section ..., as a second offend er may not be suspended to less than 10 years, and the person may be paroled during that period only in accordance with § 4-305 of the Correctional Services Article.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A defendant may move for judgment of acquittal on one or more counts, or on one or more degrees of an offense which by law is divided into degrees, at the close of the evidence offered by the State and, in a jury trial, at the close of all the evidence. The defendant shall state with particularity all reasons why the motion should be granted____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.