175 Md. App. 201 - Ishola v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Slater · Chow v. State · Evans v. State · Reier v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation · Stanley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Prohibited—Obtaining personal identifying information without consent.—A person may not knowingly, willfully, and with fraudulent intent possess, obtain, or help another to possess or obtain any personal identifying information of an individual, without the consent of the individual, in order to use, sell, or transfer the information to get a benefit, credit, good, service, or other thing of value in the name of the individual.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ishola v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.