175 Md. App. 320 - Randall v. Peaco’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Henry v. Purnell (2011), 182 Md. App. 201 - French v. Hines (2008)
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Scott v. Harris · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena · Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United States · Salim I/o v. Proulx
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] claim of excessive force brought under Article 2k is analyzed in the same manner as if the claim were brought under Article 26. In both instances, the claim is assessed under Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, rather than notions of substantive due process, precisely like the analysis employed for claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.