175 Md. App. 703 - In Re Marcus J.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[b]ecause a juvenile is, in fact, entitled to elect a de novo hearing on exceptions, and is entitled to file exceptions to `all of the master's findings, conclusions, and recommendations,' we view the exceptions filed by Marcus as sufficiently specific to communicate his election to avail himself of that right,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Marcus J.

2. “the circuit court erred in basing its dismissal of the exceptions on the juvenile's alleged failure to comply with a local `exception policy' that — as applied in this case — purportedly imposed requirements beyond those set forth in Rule 11-111 and CJP § 3-807(c).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Marcus J.

3. “excepting to [the master's] findings at the adjudicatory hearing held on 10/6/06 and the disposition hearing on 11/3/06,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Marcus J.