¶1The attorney general suggests a reargument. His claim is that after an adjudication of paternity under the bastardy statute, G. S. 1923, § 3265, the father becomes subject to the provisions of G. S. 1923, § 10136. Such a situation is not presented by the record. There has been no adjudication in a bastardy proceeding. The contention of the state was not open for argument and it was not argued. Nothing said in the decision should be taken as indicative of a holding that after an adjudication in bastardy there may or may not be a proceeding under § 10136; nor is anything we now say indicative of a holding either way.
175 Minn. 533
221 N.W 911
State v. Lindskog
Decided November 23, 1928
Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1928-11-23
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-11-23
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 1985
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →