Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 N.C. 698

95 S.E 364

Townsend v. . McCullum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1918

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1918-03-20

ActioN, tried before Lyon, J., at October Term, 1917, of Wake, upon the following issues: 1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint? Answer: “Yes.” 2. What damages, if any, did plaintiff suffer in consequence of said alleged injuries? Answer: “$1,254.” From the judgment rendered, defendant appealed.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1964

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1918-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cttbiam :

¶1 The great weight of evidence in this case tends to prove that defendant is a merchant in the town of Star, N. C.; that on 31 M^rch, 1916, he was engaged in shooting sparrows in the town and very near the Leach Hotel with a 27 Winchester rifle. In firing the rifle he sent a ball into the toilet of the hotel, which was sixty yards distant from where defendant was shooting and shot plaintiff in the head, inflicting a painful and severe wound.

¶2 We have examined the entire evidence and record and find no error. In the absence of prohibitive ordinance the defendant was guilty of such reckless conduct, if the evidence is to be believed, as must render him liable to plaintiff for the injury inflicted.

¶3 If defendant had killed plaintiff he would probably have to answer a charge of manslaughter as well as this demand for damages.

¶4 No error.

/175/nc/698 · .json · Public domain