175 N.C. 717
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 1, 1918
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1918-05-01
Appeal by defendant from Long, J., at tbe October Term, 1917, of StANLY. This is an action to recover commissions for the sale of land or damages in lieu thereof. The facts are fully reported on the former appeal in this action, 171 N. 0., 392. The jury returned the following verdict: 1. Did the defendant Parker execute and deliver to the plaintiff the contract marked “Exhibit A,” as alleged in the complaint? Answer: “Yes.” (Answered by consent.) 2.
Decided 1918-05-01
¶1The principal exception of the defendants is that there was not sufficient evidence to support the findings of the jury, but upon an examination of the record we are of opinion there was evidence, direct and circumstantial, sustaining the verdict, and that there is no reversible error.
¶2The action has been tried in accordance with the former opinion.
¶3No error.