175 N.C. App. 214 - State v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Sharpe v. Worland · Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. Berry · Hayes v. City of Wilmington · 166 N.C. App. 669 - State v. Robertson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here shall be no relief from a forfeiture except as provided in this section.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a forfeiture shall be set aside for any one of the following [seven] reasons, and none other .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“clearly states that 'there shall be no relief from a forfeiture' except as provided in the statute, and that a forfeiture 'shall be set aside for any one of the [reasons set forth in Section (b)(1-7) ], and none other.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.