175 N.C. App. 349 - State v. Yelton’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. · State v. Coffey · Daughtry v. United States · Kellogg v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we may reverse only upon a showing that the trial court's admission of [the witness's] testimony was so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“State v. Washington , 141 N.C. App. 354 , 362, 540 S.E.2d 388 , 395 (2000) (citation omitted). Accordingly,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“helpful to a clear understanding of [the witness's] testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.