Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 N.C. App. 501 - Broderick v. Broderick

175 N.C. App. 501 - Broderick v. Broderick’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Goldberg v. Ellett · Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · Steingress v. Steingress · Moldo v. Matsco, Inc. · Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assignment of error places no limit on the legal issues that could be addressed on appeal and the appellee fails to receive adequate notice of the basis upon which the appeal might be resolved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “direct the attention of the appellate court to the particular error about which the question is made, with clear and specific transcript references.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Plaintiff-Appellant assigns as error the following: Entry of the Order for Modification of Alimony filed October 7, 2004'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.