Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Ohio App. 3d 613 - State v. Watt

175 Ohio App. 3d 613 - State v. Watt’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · State v. Foster · State v. Payne · State v. Bezak · State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n invalid sentence for which there is no statutory authority is `a circumstance under which there can be no expectation of finality' to trigger the protections of the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “at any time before the offender is released from imprisonment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.