¶1The single contention made by petitioner is that he did not sign a written waiver of jury as required by Section 2945.05, Revised Code, and therefore his conviction was void.
¶2Inasmuch as petitioner entered a plea of guilty to the indictment, his contention is without foundation.
¶3The provisions of Section 2945.05, Revised Code, requiring the filing of a written waiver of a trial by jury are not applicable where a plea of guilty is entered by an accused. The failure in such an instance to file a waiver does not deprive an accused of any of his constitutional rights nor does it deprive the court of its jurisdiction. Rodrigues v. Sacks, Warden, 173 Ohio St., 456; Vertz v. Sacks, Warden, 173 Ohio St., 459; and Norton v. Green, Supt., 173 Ohio St., 531.
¶4The petitioner in the instant case has shown no denial of *148his constitutional rights nor any lack of jurisdiction of the trial court over either his person or the subject matter of the crime.
¶5Petitioner remanded to custody.