Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Okla. 247 - Corbin v. Wilkinson

Corbin v. Wilkinson’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2010

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

40193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burch v. Slick · Carr v. State Industrial Commission · Skelly Oil Co. v. Hopkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 13365, O.S.1931, as amended by section 2, ch. 29, Sess.Laws 1933 (85 Okl.St.Ann. § 41), gives the State Industrial Commission power to hear and determine liability of the respondent and insurance carrier. But this means liability only to the injured employee. The law does not contemplate that the Industrial Commission shall have power to hear and determine contractual rights between the employer and the insurance carrier.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Whether lawyers receive just or unjust compensation for their services is entirely within the control of the Industrial Commission. Lawyers ought not to be required to donate their talents and their services. They are just as much entitled to justice and fair compensation at the hands of the Industrial Commission as the injured workmen themselves.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This court has heretofore pointed out that in enacting the Workmen’s Compensation Law “the Legislature intended the benefits of the act shall flow to the injured workmen and their dependents, in order to afford them a living and prevent them from becoming public charges.” [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.