Barkus v. Lincoln’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1951
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Landers v. Bank of Commerce of Okmulgee · Lusk v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. · Jones v. Fearnow · Cotton v. McClendon · 8 Kan. App. 126 - Thomas v. Arthurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where all the ultimate facts of a case are stipulated and the case is so treated and presented to the trial court, no motion for a new trial is necessary or proper, and the filing of such motion does not operate to extend the time within which appeals may be perfected in the Supreme Court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.