Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Okla. 589 - Madden v. Tilly

Madden v. Tilly’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1972
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1972

8 state decisions

4019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Reed · Midland Valley R. Co. v. Goble · Doggett v. Doggett · Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. Serbantas · Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Morton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a well-settled rule in this state that the Supreme Court will not, on appeal, in a law action, disturb a judgment of the trial court rendered on the verdict of a jury if there is any evidence whatever reasonably tending to prove, either directly and immediately, or by permissible inference, the essential facts necessary to sustain the verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.