Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Okla. 617 - Micco v. Replogle

Micco v. Replogle’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1939
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Calkins v. Ponca City · Harris v. International Land Co. · Reeves v. Crum · Ahfonoke v. Bullett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a grantor in a deed is incapable of comprehending that the effect of the deed when executed and delivered would be to divest such grantor of title to the land described in such deed, said grantor is as to such deed entirely without understanding within the meaning of Section 4981, Comp. St. 1921 (sec. 9402, O. S. 1931, 15 Okla. St. Ann. sec. 22), and the deed is void and conveys no rights to the grantee or subsequent purchasers or incumbrancers in good faith.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.