Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 ORAPP 464 - State v. Anderson

State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So too here we remand for the trial court to determine whether defendant's statements after 2:05 p.m. in the third interview were voluntary, including making any necessary factual findings. CONCLUSION In sum, the officers did not violate defendant's right to remain silent under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution when they continued the interview after defendant said,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the waiver of rights and the confession were the product of an essentially free, unconstrained and informed choice or whether the accused's capacity for self-determination was critically impaired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must inquire into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the police interrogations to determine whether the defendant in fact knowingly and voluntarily decided”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.