State v. Codiga’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 528 - State v. Miller · 104 Wash. 2d 353 - Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply System · 95 Wash. 2d 203 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene · State v. Walsh · In Re Breedlove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant should not be charged with knowing the legal impact of his or her criminal history on the offender score. Where a criminal history is correct and complete, but the attorneys miscalculate the resulting offender score, then the defendant should not be burdened with assuming the risk of legal mistake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson“`if any additional criminal history is discovered [before sentencing], both the standard sentence range and the prosecuting attorney's recommendation may increase. Even so, my plea of guilty to this charge is binding upon me. I cannot change my mind if additional criminal history is discovered.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson“assumed the contractual risk fixed in his plea agreement that the discovery of additional criminal history would increase his offender score and standard sentencing range.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.