State v. Ra’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2020
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hoffman · State v. Pirtle · 125 Wash. 2d 847 - State v. Lough · State v. Gregory · State v. Pirtle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“And the State never presented evidence that Ra was a gang member and, if so, what the gang mores were. Without such evidence, we have no basis to conclude that the State's gang evidence was admissible under ER 404(b).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott · State v. Scott“`in deliberate disregard of the trial court's ruling, or an objection by itself would be so damaging as to be immune from any admonition or curative instruction by the trial court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pedro“Weber, 159 Wash.2d at 272 , 149 P.3d 646 (quoting Sullivan, 69 Wash.App. at 173 , 847 P.2d 953 ). Examples of such unusual circumstances are when the other party's questions were”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pedro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.