Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 So. 2d 218

Fredel v. Fredel

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1965-04-06

Relies on 72 So. 2d 671 - Pross v. Pross

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-04-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1980

4 state decisions

20196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant, former husband, presents for review the financial provisions of a decree of divorce. The sole point presented is that the chancellor erred in requiring alimony and child support in the amounts set. The appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the chancellor and the decree is affirmed upon the rule stated in Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671, 672.

¶2Affirmed.

/175/so2d/218 · .json · Public domain