Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 SO2D 920 - Kinard v. Carrier

Kinard v. Carrier’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on National Lumber Products Co. v. Ponzio · Douglas v. Village of Melrose Park · 41 Ill. App. 2d 378 - McCoy v. City of Knoxville · Dobbs v. Board of Appeals of Northampton · 155 So. 2d 776 - Sears, Roebuck & Company v. City of Alexandria

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decision of our State Supreme Court in Onorato v. Rossignol, 217 La. 751 , 47 So.2d 489 [La.1950) ], is not inconsistent with these decisions or the legal principles above stated. There, a dry-cleaning establishment was held to have lost its nonconforming status in a residential area because the property had been vacant for over two years. However, in that instance (unlike the present), the municipal zoning ordinance applicable specifically provided a nonconforming status was lost if the nonconforming building remained vacant continuously for more than six months.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the preponderant jurisprudence... a vacancy due to inability to secure tenants does not constitute a discontinuance, interruption or abandonment of such nonconforming commercial use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This, however, is the prevailing law in American jurisdictions, in the absence of a specific provision in the municipal zoning ordinance providing otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.