175 So. 3d 1053 - Morgan v. Pardue’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 52 So. 3d 909 - Input/Output Marine Systems, Inc. v. Wilson Greatbatch, Technologies, Inc. · 91 So. 3d 1073 - Gaten v. Tangipahoa Parish School System · 153 So. 3d 1035 - Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Co. · 150 So. 3d 610 - Goal Properties, Inc. v. Prestridge · Young v. Tolintino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a) The repayment of FSA of $16,915.66 ($16,452.00 in principal and $463.66 in interest) which is the amount of the three (3) CRP payments which [Gary] actually received subsequent to the sale plus interest; b) The balance of the retained and reserved CRP payments which amounts to $38,388.00; c) The cost share due by [Gary] to FSA in the amount of $5,751.88; d) The liquidated damages due to FSA ■ ■ in the amount of $1,370.94; e) Lost hunting lease rentals in the amount of $1,500.00 for four (4) years, totaling $6,000.00.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A sale can be dissolved when a party-fails to make payment. Because [Craig] made or attempted to make payment as set forth in the promissory note—and losing CRP payments was due to [Gary’s] own failure to notify the USDA FSA—the trial court erred in dissolving the sale between [Gary] and the Par-dues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.