175 So. 3d 419 - State v. Stokes’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Davis v. Washington · State v. Sepulvado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 16 of the Louisiana Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense. State v. Dressner, 2008-1366 (La. 7/6/10), 45 So.3d 127 , 137, cert. denied , 562 U.S. 1271 , 131 S.Ct. 1605 , 179 L.Ed.2d 500 (2011) ; State v. Stokes, 2014-1562 (La. App. 1st Cir. 6/17/15), 175 So.3d 419 , 423. The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment provides that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McIntosh“[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McIntosh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.