Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 SO3D 843 - Rosario v. State

Rosario v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Davis v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To use the inadmissible information in evaluating the expert's testimony, the jury must make a preliminary judgment about whether this information is true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.