Matthews v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins · Moss v. State · Coates v. State · State v. Redman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Strickland and its progeny only recognize three types of cases in which prejudice normally may be presumed: (1) where there has been an actual or constructive denial of the right to counsel altogether; (2) where the [S]tate has affirmatively interfered with counsel’s representation; and (3) where counsel’s representation is impeded by an actual conflict of interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mann v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.