Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 S.W.3d 184

State v. Gauch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-11-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2008

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-11-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 William W. Gauch (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury of possession of methamphetamine, Section 195.202, RSMo 2000, and attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, Section 565.202, RSMo 2000, for which Defendant was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to two concurrent sentences of twelve years’ imprisonment.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/175/sw3d/184 · .json · Public domain