Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 S.W.3d 207

State v. Ewing

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-11-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2008

1 state decisions

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-11-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 The defendant Jermaine Ewing appeals his conviction for assault in the first degree in violation of section 565.050 RSMo. (2000) 1 and for armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. In two points on appeal, the defendant alleges improper strikes of four African-American venire-person in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Finding no error, we affirm.

¶3 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

¶4 We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

¶5 . All statutory references are to RSMo.2000.

/175/sw3d/207 · .json · Public domain