Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 S.W.3d 208

State v. Mims

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-11-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2007

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-11-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Oscar Mims appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for trafficking in the second degree.

¶3 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

/175/sw3d/208 · .json · Public domain