Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 SW3D 756 - Keeter v. State

Keeter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Schlup v. Delo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All a party has to do to avoid the forfeiture of a complaint on appeal is to let the trial judge know what he wants, why he thinks himself entitled to it, and to do so clearly enough for the judge to understand him at a time when the trial court is in a proper position to do something about it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the factual issues may have been intertwined, but the legal issues were not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “State and defense lawyers should not testify before the jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.