Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 U.S. 677 - The Paquete Habana

The Paquete Habana’s Empirical Analysis

175 U.S. 677 · 1900

Citation profile

810
cited by 810 later decisions
45
cited 45 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

296 federal appellate · 94 district · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 810 later decisions (45 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino (1964), Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (2004)

296 federal appellate · 94 district · 51 state decisions — followed in 16 states

19301900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hans v. State of Louisiana · Hilton v. Guyot · Underhill v. Hernandez · Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 810 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “International law is part of our law, and must be ascertained and administered by the courts of justice of appropriate jurisdiction, as often as questions of right depending upon it are duly presented for their determination.”
    50 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the general assent of civilized nations.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Amd even where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet, if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first, and embraces new provisions, plainly showing that it was intended as a substitute for the first act, it will operate as a repeal of that act.” (Underscoring by writer.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.