Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 VA 118 - Bristow v. Brauer

Bristow v. Brauer’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 1966
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1966

16 state decisions

60194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tignor v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. · Richmond-Washington Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Austin · Cochran v. London Assurance Corp. · Revell v. Ballard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`If a condition of facts is such that the jury may adduce from them more than one inference or conclusion, the court, upon a motion to set aside their verdict * * * has no such discretion, but is bound down to that interpretation of the facts, and is constrained to adopt that conclusion from the evidence, which the jury have sanctioned by their verdict.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘Not every witness is a master of expression, and it sometimes happens that under skillful cross-examination, a witness unintentionally says or imperfectly says something, that may appear to be inconsistent with previous statements. The jury, however, have the entire picture before them and can make proper allowances.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.