Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 VA 73 - Edmonds v. Mapp

Edmonds v. Mapp’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McCormick v. Elsea · Stoneburner & Richards v. Motley · Stuart v. Hoffman & Co. · Dunlop v. McGehee's

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a general practice to require, when one creditor, suing for himself and others, who may come in and contribute to the expenses of suit, institutes proceedings for their common benefit, that those who derive a benefit shall bear their proportion of the expense and not throw the whole burden on one. This is equitable and just. But it only applies to those creditors who derive a benefit from the services of counsel in a cause in which they are not specially represented by counsel. If a creditor has his own counsel in a cause, he cannot be required to contribute to the compensation of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.