Taylor v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2020
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klein v. Klein · DeBeaumont v. Goodrich · Stickney v. Stickney · Johnson v. Johnson · Wolter v. Wolter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless the discretion was erroneously exercised, or was exercised upon unfounded considerations or to an extent clearly unreasonable in light of the evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“in the context of the surrounding circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The threshold determination of changed circumstances is discretionary, and no fixed standards exist for determining what meets the threshold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Atherton v. Atherton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.