Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Vt. 469 - State v. Marallo

State v. Marallo’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · State v. Howe · State v. Pierce · State v. Nemkovich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]egardless of whether counsel was present, [the NTO] would have issued and the sample would have been taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`minimal risk that . . . counsel's absence. . . might derogate from [the] right to a fair trial.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.