Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Wash. 123 - Locke v. Andrasko

Locke v. Andrasko’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1942
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Prevost v. Gratz · Davis v. Shepard · Meeks v. Olpherts · Pierce v. Wade · Patchett v. Pac. Coast Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In one of the texts cited by appellants, 37 C. J. 1020, although stating that, in a majority of jurisdictions, where the title or right of action vests in a personal representative, guardian, or trustee, the statute of limitations begins to run notwithstanding the minority of the beneficiary, and where the former is barred by the statute, the latter is likewise barred, but continues: “ ‘In a few jurisdictions, however, a contrary doctrine prevails, and a minor may sue within the statutory period after attaining his majority, even where the representative or trustee is barred by the statute.’ “That seems to be the settled rule in this state under our statute and the cases heretofore cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.