Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Wash. 536 - Nichols v. McDougal

Nichols v. McDougal’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2008

8 state decisions

4019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowles Co. v. Clark · Bjorkstam v. Federal Land Bank · Ross v. Johnson · Allen v. Farmers & Merchants Bank · Koppler v. Bugge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ostensible authority of an agent can be inferred only from acts and conduct of the principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.