State v. Hunley’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
47 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mitchell v. United States · 125 Wash. 2d 570 - State v. Gentry · 90 Wash. 2d 476 - Seattle School District No. 1 v. State · 80 Wash. 2d 547 - Sorenson v. City of Bellingham · State v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[ (1) ] the public or private nature of the question presented, [ (2) ] the desirability of an authoritative determination for the future guidance of public officers, and [ (3) ] the likelihood of future recurrence of the question.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'A case is technically moot if the court can no longer provide effective relief.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the amendment to RGW 9.94A.530(2)— No.97209-5 Page 4 which makes the defendant's failure to object to a criminal history summary an acknowledgment—is unconstitutional on its face”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.