175 Wis. 2d 270 - Lindas v. Cady’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e hold that when a state agency, "acting in a judicial capacity... resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate," (citation omitted), federal courts must give the agency's factfinding the same preclusive effect to which it would be entitled in the State's courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“acting in a judicial capacity... resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“need do no more than satisfy the minimum procedural requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause . . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.