Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Wis. 2d 684 - State v. Koch

175 Wis. 2d 684 - State v. Koch’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. Huebner (2000), 224 Wis. 2d 201 - State v. Secrist (1999)

2 federal appellate · 99 state decisions

4601993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Gerstein v. Pugh · Griffith v. Kentucky · County of Riverside v. McLaughlin · 50 Wis. 2d 619 - State v. Paszek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A] new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a "clear break"'with the past.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “prosecution is pending, no judgment of conviction has been entered, the right to a state court appeal from a final judgment has not been exhausted, and the time for certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court has not expired.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Initial appearance before a judge. (1) Any person who is arrested shall be taken within a reasonable time before a judge in the county in which the offense was alleged to have been committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.