Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 W. Va. 141 - State v. Lambert

175 W. Va. 141 - State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2000

7 state decisions

30198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 161 W. Va. 517 - State v. Starkey · 165 W. Va. 547 - State v. Grimm · 171 W. Va. 212 - State v. Hall · 146 W. Va. 534 - State v. De Berry · 170 W. Va. 249 - State Ex Rel. Shorter v. Hey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every person charged by presentment or indictment with a felony or misdemeanor, and remanded to a court of competent jurisdiction for trial, shall be forever discharged from prosecution for the offense, if there be three regular terms of such court, after the presentment is made or the indictment is found against him, without a trial, unless the failure to try him was caused by his insanity; or by the witnesses for the State being enticed or kept away, or prevented from attending by sickness or inevitable accident; or by a continuance granted on the motion of the accused; or by reason of his escaping from jail, or failing to appear according to his recognizance, or of the inability of the jury to agree in their verdict....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.