Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 W. Va. 233 - State v. Duell

175 W. Va. 233 - State v. Duell’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably 195 W. Va. 551 - State v. Sutphin (1995), 178 W. Va. 618 - State v. Miller (1987)

28 state decisions

1201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Carbide Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · 157 W. Va. 640 - State v. Thomas · Gordon v. United States · 128 W. Va. 299 - Yuncke v. Welker · 169 W. Va. 191 - State v. Hatfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a trial court grants a pre-trial discovery motion requiring the prosecution to disclose evidence in its possession, non-disclosure by the prosecution is fatal to its case where such non-disclosure is prejudicial. The non-disclosure is prejudicial where the defense is surprised on a material issue and where the failure to make the disclosure hampers the preparation and presentation of the defendant’s case.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether evidence offered is too remote to be admissible upon the trial of a case is for the trial court to decide in the exercise of sound discretion; and its action in excluding or admitting the evidence will not be disturbed by the appellate court unless it appears that such action amounts to an abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Evidence of a threat made by a defendant on trial for murder, against the life of the person alleged to have been murdered, coupled with a statement of the manner or means by which such threat was intended to be carried out, is admissible.” Syl. pt. 3, State v. Flint, 142 W.Va. 509 , 96 S.E.2d 677 (1957).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.