Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 W. Va. 381 - State v. Armstrong

175 W. Va. 381 - State v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2003

21 state decisions

120198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Scott v. Illinois · Baldasar v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the sixth amendment of the federal constitution and article III, section 14 of the West Virginia Constitution, unless an individual convicted of a misdemeanor was represented by counsel or knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel, such prior conviction may not be used to enhance a sentence of imprisonment for a subsequent offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “it is well established that if no imprisonment could have been imposed for a particular misdemeanor conviction for the reasons stated in Argersinger [ v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972)] and Scott, then that conviction may not be used as part of the basis for imprisonment under an enhancement statute. Baldasar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222 , 100 S.Ct. 1585 , 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] conviction upon a plea of guilty rather than after a full trial does not diminish the right to counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.