Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 W. Va. 389 - Federoff v. Rutledge

175 W. Va. 389 - Federoff v. Rutledge’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2003

14 state decisions

100198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · 166 W. Va. 675 - Kisamore v. Rutledge · 25 Cal. App. 3d 1035 - Jacobs v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board · 173 W. Va. 268 - Albrecht v. State · Hill v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... conduct evincing such willful and wanton disregard of an employer’s interest as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of his employee, ...On the other hand, ... good faith errors in judgment ... are not to be deemed “misconduct” within the meaning of the statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The appellant’s defense that he did not report to work intoxicated or drink on the job is no defense to the charge that he ignored previous oral warnings not to report to work in such an odoriferous condition. Being employed in a position with supervisory duties, such as the appellant in the instant case, or being in a position where one is in contact with the employer’s customers, particularly compels such a determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Findings of fact by the Board of Review of the West Virginia Department of Employment Security, in an unemployment compensation case, should not be set aside unless such findings are plainly wrong_” Syl. pt. 1, Kisamore v. Rutledge, [ 166 W.Va. 675 ] 276 S.E.2d 821 (W.Va.1981).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.