Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 W. Va. 463 - State v. Clements

175 W. Va. 463 - State v. Clements’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 194 W. Va. 97 - Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc. (1995), 193 W. Va. 147 - State v. McGinnis (1994)

35 state decisions

1201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3105 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Costello v. United States · United States v. Dinitz · 161 W. Va. 530 - State v. Pratt · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the trial of a criminal case, a defendant who elects to testify may have his credibility impeached by showing prior convictions of perjury or false swearing and criminal convictions of making false statements with intent to deceive, but it is impermissible to impeach his credibility through any other prior convictions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"In the trial of a criminal case, a defendant who elects to testify may have his credibility impeached by showing prior convictions of perjury or false swearing, but it is impermissible to impeach his credibility through any other prior convictions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.