Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 W. Va. 709 - State v. Hickman

175 W. Va. 709 - State v. Hickman’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
4
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably 192 W. Va. 247 - State v. Farley (1994), State v. Reed (1993)

43 state decisions

2001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Stovall v. Denno · Edwards v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘A trial court’s decision regarding the voluntariness of a confession will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong or clearly against the weight of the evidence.’ Syllabus Point 3, State v. Vance, 162 W.Va. 467 , 250 S.E.2d 146 (1978).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ “Voluntary drunkenness is generally never an excuse for a crime, but where a defendant is charged with murder, and it appears that the defendant was too drunk to be capable of deliberating and premeditating, in that instance intoxication may reduce murder in the first degree to murder in the second degree, as long as the specific intent did not antedate the intoxication.’ Syllabus Point 2, State v. Keeton, 166 W.Va. 77 , 272 S.E.2d 817 (1980).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant who is being held for custodial interrogation must be advised, in addition to the Miranda rights, that counsel has been retained or appointed to represent him where the law enforcement officials involved have knowledge of the attorney's retention or appointment. This rule is based on the theory that without this information, a defendant cannot be said to have voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.