Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 A2D 583 - State v. Cullum

State v. Cullum’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1983

3 state decisions

10196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Frost · Rindge v. Holbrook · State v. Vaughan · State v. Laudano · State v. Gannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the trial of a person charged with the commission of a crime, it is more important to enforce the time-tested safeguards which the law has erected for the protection of the innocent than to distort and subvert them in order to block the escape from punishment of even an apparently guilty person. Such has ever been the policy of this state. [ 176 A.2d at 586 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.