Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 A3D 877 - Commonwealth v. Santos

Commonwealth v. Santos’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3322

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Amgen Inc. v. New York · Smith v. Cain · Commonwealth v. Roney · Smith v. Cain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule, the court may order such party to permit discovery or inspection, may grant a continuance, or may prohibit such party from introducing evidence not disclosed, other than testimony of the defendant, or it may enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Any evidence favorable to the accused that is material either to guilt or to punishment, and is within the possession or control of the attorney for the Commonwealth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) requested by the defendant, (2) material to the case, and (3) within the possession or control of the prosecutor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.