Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

176 A.D.2d 20

Golding v. Golding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1992-02-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-02-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2012

6 state decisions

20199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Kupferman, J. (dissenting in part).

¶1While in a case involving the Jewish religion, it may be instructive to cite Christian v Christian (42 NY2d 63), the principles of equity there manifest lead also to the conclusion that the parties should be returned to their original positions, and that, as a condition for striking the affirmative defenses, the plaintiff should give back the "Get”.

¶2Ellerin and Asch, JJ., concur with Mironas, J. R; Kupferman, J., dissents in part in a separate opinion.

¶3Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about June 5, 1990, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

/176/ad2d/20 · .json · Public domain