Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Cal. 516 - Gray v. Huffaker

Gray v. Huffaker’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 1961
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1961

6 state decisions

30191719201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 52 N.J. Eq. 628 - Standish v. Babcock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon- these facts the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the money of Gray so appropriated to the use of the defendants. . . . She received a benefit from his money to the same extent as if she herself had received the money and had applied it to pay the mortgage debt. (Standish v. Babcock, 52 N. J. Eq. 628 [ 29 Atl. 327 ].) ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.