Burkett v. Doty’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 1990 · most notably Lefrooth v. Prentice (1927), Dinneen v. Younger (1943)
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crocker v. Hall · Kenney v. Parks · Knight v. Tripp · Driscoll v. Driscoll · Gould v. Wise
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It must be remembered that, as between donor and donee, it is not necessary to the validity of a gift inter vivos, if made by a written instrument transferring the title to the donee, that the possession of the thing given [notes] be passed to the donee. * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.